Triage queue delivered by 20 Nov 2026

Said by Spencer Tait, VP Engineering · SDUK (title at the time) · 28 Oct 2026, 14:22 · documented by Rich Hill 28 Oct 17:05

Verify chain Export this fact

Reply window: notified 28 Oct, closes 11 Nov 2026. Kate Osei has replied; Omar Haddad has not yet.day 9 of 14

§1The words verbatim from the source, located byte-for-byte

We will have the triage queue in your hands by the twentieth of November, with the banding in place, and I’m happy for that to go on the record.

▶ Play this moment · 14:22–14:31Source: Fireflies transcript, scoping call 28 Oct 2026 · speaker label “Speaker 2” → Spencer Tait (speaker map set 28 Oct)

Kate Osei · 14:21…and the thing my team keep asking is when they can actually start working the queue rather than the spreadsheet. Spencer Tait · 14:22Understood. We will have the triage queue in your hands by the twentieth of November, with the banding in place, and I’m happy for that to go on the record. The rate cards follow the week after. Omar Haddad · 14:22And that includes the large-band pricing we talked about? Spencer Tait · 14:23The banding, yes. Pricing is Paul’s side.

§2Responses append-only · each chained from the fact’s hash

Kate Osei · Operations Director, ClaimsHive · 29 Oct 2026 09:14 · sso:microsoft

Accepted “That is what we heard. Thank you.”

Omar Haddad · Head of Claims, ClaimsHive

Awaiting reply · due 11 Nov reminder goes out 7 Nov (day 10)

§3On the same subject

RecollectionagreementReply due 13 Nov 2026#18 · uncorroborated until Kate replies

Kate and I agreed over coffee that the data migration from their spreadsheet is in scope for phase one, not a change request.

This is: Rich Hill’s own account, attributed to Rich. The record does not claim Kate said this; it records that Rich says they agreed it.
Conversation: In person · The Ivy, Manchester · Thu 30 Oct 2026, about 12:30
Written down: 30 Oct 2026, 14:40 — 2 h after the conversation
Present: Rich Hill · Kate Osei
Kate’s reply: not yet · a rejection here is a good outcome: the misunderstanding surfaces now

Rich’s account (the source, hashed 41d0…e2f9)Lunch with Kate at the Ivy. Talked through phase one. Kate and I agreed over coffee that the data migration from their spreadsheet is in scope for phase one, not a change request. She will send the sheet on Monday.

Related: #16, disputed 24 Oct“Hosting stays in SDUK’s AWS for the pilot” — Omar attached his own Teams transcript as a disputing span. Both accounts sit on the record side by side; nobody has ruled.